A Very Important Question For You All
Saturday, 21 March 2009 13:09I like lighthearted, funny films where people live happily ever after, but it has come to my attention that most all Romantic Comedies actually suck like a big old Dyson bag-less vacuum. They suck like Oldham Athletic and they suck like syphilis.
Why do they suck? Is it that most seem to aspire to be 'screwball' but just screw it up? Is it that they always feature Rich People, and almost always Rich White People? Is it that the films' sense of gender equality rarely exists or exists only on a cosmetic level? Is it that they almost always promote a very particular way of living (married, conventional, non-boat-rocking)?
So tell me, if you like rom-coms, what do you wish they did better? What do you wish they'd do at all? What do you wish they'd do differently/not do at all?

Why do they suck? Is it that most seem to aspire to be 'screwball' but just screw it up? Is it that they always feature Rich People, and almost always Rich White People? Is it that the films' sense of gender equality rarely exists or exists only on a cosmetic level? Is it that they almost always promote a very particular way of living (married, conventional, non-boat-rocking)?
So tell me, if you like rom-coms, what do you wish they did better? What do you wish they'd do at all? What do you wish they'd do differently/not do at all?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 16:46 (UTC)I think that's why I usually prefer TV romances, because they have more time to develop, and are less likely to have outrageous plots to get there (though plenty of shows still utilize them). My favorite TV relationship is Jim and Pam on The Office, because they are middle-class people who are friends who fall in love. And now that they're together you get to see them confront everyday challenges (long-distance relationship, Pam's parent's separating) and how they affect their love for each other, which I find much more romantic than the "kiss and everything's perfect" rom-com thing.