We've got HER Permission!
Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:40Check this baby out:
Rowling Backs Potter Fan Fiction
Although... have to ask... why does SQ get a mention AND a link? Isn't that a little partisan? Would it not have been rather more diplomatic and give FAP a mention? And FF.net? Way to make us all look like sub-literate moronic 9 year olds.
ETA: You know that 'should the trio be replaced' thing? Well, that's also on BBC News.... complete with a mention of Stockard Channing being 33 when she was Rizzo. Are the BBC checking out LJ these days?
Rowling Backs Potter Fan Fiction
Although... have to ask... why does SQ get a mention AND a link? Isn't that a little partisan? Would it not have been rather more diplomatic and give FAP a mention? And FF.net? Way to make us all look like sub-literate moronic 9 year olds.
ETA: You know that 'should the trio be replaced' thing? Well, that's also on BBC News.... complete with a mention of Stockard Channing being 33 when she was Rizzo. Are the BBC checking out LJ these days?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:14 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:14 (UTC)Oh, how do you do a standfirst?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:20 (UTC)The standfirst [that they have as an example] is the classic two-sentence version: the first sentence explains what the story's all about and says why you're reading it now; the second sentence, which incorporates the byline, gives more detail on the feature itself.
The standfirst can be extended if there is more space or more to say - but generally the two-setence version works better than longer ones. The second setence can be cut to a simple '[name] reports', or the standfirst can be cut to a single sentence: '[name] talks to [interviewee] about [issue, and why its now]'.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:23 (UTC)And is it on a separate page of the copy? He didn't tell us (that I recall) how to set it out.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 07:27 (UTC)